Reply to thread

You make a good point..to a point. He is representing the company he is working for no matter where he is and what he's doing and his comments didn't sit well with his employer therefore he was discharged...Kinda like prospective employees having tattoos...the employer may not want an idividual with tattoos respresenting their company...they're not being discriminating just looking out for the betterment of the company. Maybe they DO hire them but only at a particular capacity...no interfacing with potential/existing customers, etc.