Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SRAD97750" data-source="post: 225241" data-attributes="member: 425">Looking at data from the last 150 years or so...<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_California" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_California</a>Approximately 10 years apart, California will experience a 7.0-7.3They can't get any bigger than an estimated 8.0 due to our physical fault lengths. It's literal math.This was the BIG ONE everyone talk about. It did nothing.This is par for the course and why I forgot all about the earthquake within a few hours. The epicenter is what determines the amount of destruction.California is much larger than what the 'common complainer' would let you believe.Most people didn't even feel it. -BIG DAN<img src="https://www.dirtbikeaddicts.com/static/images/smilies/thumb.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":thumb:" title="Thumb&nbsp; &nbsp; :thumb:" data-shortname=":thumb:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="SRAD97750, post: 225241, member: 425"] Looking at data from the last 150 years or so... [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_California[/URL] Approximately 10 years apart, California will experience a 7.0-7.3 They can't get any bigger than an estimated 8.0 due to our physical fault lengths. It's literal math. This was the BIG ONE everyone talk about. It did nothing. This is par for the course and why I forgot all about the earthquake within a few hours. The epicenter is what determines the amount of destruction. California is much larger than what the 'common complainer' would let you believe. Most people didn't even feel it. -BIG DAN:thumb: [/QUOTE]

Verification