Good enough for the bronco, that should hold.
nobody will ever see it once its in the vehicle anywayGood enough for the bronco, that should hold.
nobody will ever see it once its in the vehicle anyway
The 302 was a good little engine (for the time it was little)
its not "fast" but it surprises me how well the one in the bronco moves that heavy chunk of lead. much better than any of the chevy 305's I've driven
Up until my dad caught super duty fever we had a large assortment of chevies, 305's, 350's, 454's, there was even a 307 in the bunch, although it never good even when it was running right, the 350's and 454's made good work trucks, the 305's were always the last choice.The early to mid 80's Impala with the 4v 305 and the TH700R4 went like a bat out of hell, in the pickup it was decent, but the 302 probably had a bit more torque to move the ford half tons. But the 305 was a very good motor, I even ran one in a stock car that ate up all the 350 and 400 sb's mostly because it would hit the redline at the time I shut down for the corners while the aforementioned engines had not quite peaked at that point. One weekend I set a track record during time trials, beat out all the other classes including sportsman with my little (slightly modded) "stock" 305.
Up until my dad caught super duty fever we had a large assortment of chevies, 305's, 350's, 454's, there was even a 307 in the bunch, although it never good even when it was running right, the 350's and 454's made good work trucks, the 305's were always the last choice.
but that was in a truck, not a race car.
The locals love old chevy 350's, although most of them run around blowing oil out the tail pipe and running on probably like 60psi per cylinder if that.No argument there, the 305 had good top end power, not great for a truck application. The ford engines seemed to hold up longer than the Chevy sb's especially on the lower end.